Aim & Scope

Aim

Communications, Electronics and Sensing Systems provides a peer-reviewed venue for communications, electronics, and sensing systems. The journal is intended for communications engineers, electronics researchers, sensing-system designers, and applied signal-processing groups. Its editorial goal is to publish articles that make the research question, method, evidence, and limitations visible enough for readers to evaluate and reuse.

Core Scope

The journal considers manuscripts in the following areas:

  • Original studies in wireless communications with transparent assumptions and evaluable evidence.
  • Research on sensor systems that explains methods, data, and interpretation limits.
  • Applied work involving embedded electronics where practical relevance is supported by analysis rather than assertion.
  • Interdisciplinary work connecting signal acquisition to adjacent scientific, engineering, health, environmental, social, or policy questions.

Article Types Considered

The journal may consider measurement papers, prototype reports, signal-processing studies, communications models, sensor deployments, and reviews. Article type should be selected according to the main contribution, not according to desired length or perceived prestige.

Method and Evidence Expectations

For this field, manuscripts should pay particular attention to:

  • device or network configuration
  • measurement protocol
  • noise and uncertainty
  • comparison with baselines
  • environmental conditions

Out of Scope

The journal does not consider manuscripts that are purely promotional, lack a research question, duplicate previously published work, make unsupported clinical or policy claims, present unverifiable results, or fall outside communications, electronics, and sensing systems. Manuscripts that are technically sound but do not fit the journal's subject identity may be returned before peer review.

Editorial Standard

The journal does not require spectacular novelty. It requires a clear contribution, appropriate citations, transparent methods, relevant ethical approvals where needed, and a limitations section. Reviewers and editors should ask whether the work is trustworthy and useful for its intended readership.